Archive for April, 2010

Lemon Law Judgment against Mercedes-Benz Today

April 2, 2010

I just got back from Los Angeles to see a probate lawyer and like I said earlier it is time to get writing. This post is essentially part 2 of the article I posted about this case in the last blog post. I almost got into an accident over there. According to the article, Mercedes-Benz acknowledged the car was defective, but they dragged things out until the customer was compelled to hire a lemon law attorney to get his refund. Too bad this is not unusual. Switching gears temporarily, if you need a qualified Los Angeles probate lawyer then I do suggest this fine resource, they can help with a wide array of probate cases in Los Angeles, a very good lawyer indeed.
Dealer and manufacturers tend to bounce the customer back and forth through a variety of means, including repairing items that do not fix the problem, and trying to persuade you that there is actually nothing wrong. They may explain that the problem is part of how the vehicle runs, or claiming the customer is somehow at fault. Unbelievable.
The article says that this can go on for years, wearing the customer down and leaving them stuck with an undrivable vehicle. Hopefully that victim will hire an experienced lemon law attorney.
Isn’t it too bad big business doesn’t just do the right thing? The many tactics dealers and manufacturers use can make this a very frustrating experience for the consumer. Thank goodness there is some protection under the law. The consumer will have to hang in there and find a qualified lemon law attorney to help them obtain the replacement or refund they are entitled to by law.

The legal Judgement against Mercedes-Benz

April 2, 2010

I just returned from Los Angeles after seeing an accident attorney and thought it was time to get back to writing and of course reporting: Lemon Law Judgment against Mercedes-Benz– is the headline today, March 24, 2010, in the The Open Press’ website, in the Free Press Release Newswire column,
The article says that buying a “lemon,” which is identified as a car with a defect that cannot be repaired, is commonly thought to be a situation with used cars which can cause an accident. However, the recent judgment against Mercedes-Benz USA LLC resulting in $482,000 in damages and legal costs to a Wisconsin customer is not a case involving used car. And if you do need a qualified Los Angeles accident attorney then you may want to consider Mansell for personal injury as well as automobile accident cases. He is a qualified attorney overall.
It may be the largest judgment involving a single car under a state “lemon law,” which protects consumers who are sold junk cars—notes the Open Press article. It reports that both Wisconsin and California have some of the strongest lemon law statutes which is good if you live in Los Angeles.
Why doesn’t that surprise me? According to the article, when a customer purchases a car that does not run, and cannot be repaired, they are entitled by law to demand a replacement or refund.
The case in question concerns involves a 2005 Mercedes-Benz E 320 that had been in disputation for more than four years. Right after the car was bought, it often would not start. Although the battery was replaced multiple times, it did not solve problem. After several attempts to fix it the dealership said the problem could not be fixed. Well, if you have that car you may want to get yourself a good accident attorney or lawyer.